so murderer did a background check on the victims before he shot them. Or was it: guy we worship killed some people, let's do a character assassination on the victims and oh gee we found a criminal record after the fact? So murdering people accused, or that have priors is okay now? Seems like that goes against the Constitution. 2A people love to yell about Constitution, but ignore most of it.
so murderer did a background check on the victims before he shot them. Or was it: guy we worship killed some people, let's do a character assassination on the victims and oh gee we found a criminal record after the fact? So murdering people accused, or that have priors is okay now? Seems like that goes against the Constitution. 2A people love to yell about Constitution, but ignore most of it.
I don't care about their priors but they do explain the mindset of those that were clapped. Anywho I have two working eyes and I saw the videos and they without a shadow of a doubt prove he acted in self-defense. You can blather on about how he shouldn't be there (if you say he shouldn't the rioters shouldn't as well) and he shouldn't have had a firearm. I shudder to think what they would have done to him if he hadn't had one.
We know exactly what would have happened to him if he didn't have a firearm. They would have hospitalized him and turned the gas station into a firebomb, just like they did the prior two nights.
No, it's "guy who committed legitimate self defense against lethal force was acquitted when the actual facts were judged". He's not a murderer because he didn't commit murder. But you already knew that because you read the article.
so murderer did a background check on the victims before he shot them. Or was it: guy we worship killed some people, let's do a character assassination on the victims and oh gee we found a criminal record after the fact? So murdering people accused, or that have priors is okay now? Seems like that goes against the Constitution. 2A people love to yell about Constitution, but ignore most of it.
I don't care about their priors but they do explain the mindset of those that were clapped. Anywho I have two working eyes and I saw the videos and they without a shadow of a doubt prove he acted in self-defense. You can blather on about how he shouldn't be there (if you say he shouldn't the rioters shouldn't as well) and he shouldn't have had a firearm. I shudder to think what they would have done to him if he hadn't had one.
We know exactly what would have happened to him if he didn't have a firearm. They would have hospitalized him and turned the gas station into a firebomb, just like they did the prior two nights.
No, it's "guy who committed legitimate self defense against lethal force was acquitted when the actual facts were judged". He's not a murderer because he didn't commit murder. But you already knew that because you read the article.