1) Ayn Rand would probably support Israel, but also
2) "this article is going to lose its publication subscribers"
Before publication I figured I'd have at least 5 response threads phrased like yours. So far I've got 2. I expect 3 more. If you want to unsubscribe, that's fine, but I also wonder if you would have taken the article differently if it was published a month ago, or a month from now.
I suppose Ayn Rand would have supported Israel, though I don't see what that has to do with my comment. Also, I have not unsubscribed. And no one can know how I or anyone else would have "taken" the article a month ago or a month from now, but I think my perception of your argument's structure would have been the same. And of course (see above) my response "was predicted repeatedly in the article." That's how an unfalsifiable little machine works.
^^ This response was predicted repeatedly in the article as well.
I admire so much of your work here on Substack. But this post reads like the work of a middle-school dude who has just discovered Ayn Rand.
1) Ayn Rand would probably support Israel, but also
2) "this article is going to lose its publication subscribers"
Before publication I figured I'd have at least 5 response threads phrased like yours. So far I've got 2. I expect 3 more. If you want to unsubscribe, that's fine, but I also wonder if you would have taken the article differently if it was published a month ago, or a month from now.
I suppose Ayn Rand would have supported Israel, though I don't see what that has to do with my comment. Also, I have not unsubscribed. And no one can know how I or anyone else would have "taken" the article a month ago or a month from now, but I think my perception of your argument's structure would have been the same. And of course (see above) my response "was predicted repeatedly in the article." That's how an unfalsifiable little machine works.
Low/zero reading comprehension.
PROJECTION
LOL
b0t